The global push for decarbonization and electrification is intensifying, with stringent emissions regulations driving rapid innovation in battery technology. Manufacturers face immense pressure to deliver safer, more durable, and higher-performing batteries that can operate reliably across diverse climates. This technology offers a strategic advantage by enabling superior low-temperature performance, a critical factor for EV adoption in colder regions and for optimizing grid stability with renewable energy integration. It positions licensees to meet evolving market demands and gain a competitive edge.
Overcomes the low-temperature electrical conductivity degradation faced by conventional technologies, enabling stable battery performance across a wide temperature range.
Offers diverse choices for element M in general formula (1), allowing for optimal solid electrolyte design and tuning to meet specific application and cost targets.
Secures a stable IP foundation with 21 broad claims, having overcome seven prior art references cited by the examiner and a rejection notice during prosecution.
This patent protects a novel solid electrolyte composition based on hexagonal perovskite-related compounds, specifically defined by general formula (1). It establishes a broad scope of protection with 21 claims, having successfully navigated detailed examination against seven prior art references and overcoming a rejection notice, indicating a robust and difficult-to-invalidate right.
This patent focuses on the electrolyte composition. White space exists in optimizing electrode materials and interfaces, or developing novel battery cell architectures that leverage this electrolyte for specific high-power or fast-charging applications.
Implementing this technology in solid-state batteries could mitigate performance degradation in low-temperature environments, extending EV range in cold regions and improving energy efficiency for stationary storage systems. For example, assuming an average 5% improvement in energy loss and a 10% extension in component lifespan compared to conventional solutions, an estimated ~$1.5M/year (excluding initial investment) in operational cost reduction and enhanced product competitiveness could be achieved. This translates to an efficiency improvement of approximately $16.50/unit (EV) or $1.65/kWh (stationary) per year for 100,000 EVs or a 1GWh stationary battery system (AI est.).
X: Low-Temperature Operational Stability
Y: Material Design Flexibility